Somerset Local Plan Scoping Consultation 2026

Closes 24 Jul 2026

Role and Function - the role of different settlements in Somerset

This section explains the Settlement Role and Function Study, which is an important part of the evidence for the Somerset Local Plan.

The study brings together previous work from the former district councils with the latest data about our settlements to create a single, Somerset-wide settlement hierarchy.

What the study does

The study looks at 176 settlements across Somerset and assesses them based on four main factors:

  • Size of the settlement (for example, population)
  • Employment role (availability of jobs and economic activity)
  • Services and facilities (such as shops, schools and community spaces)
  • Accessibility and connectivity (how easy it is to get to jobs, services and other places by different types of transport)

Other information, such as environmental constraints, travel patterns and digital connectivity is also considered to provide context.

How the hierarchy was developed

Summary

Each settlement has been assessed using a scoring approach, based on the key factors above. These scores are then used to group settlements into different tiers.

The factors and data used were identified through:

  • Review of previous studies and national guidance
  • Local data analysis
  • Early engagement with councils and stakeholders

Detailed information

The Settlement Role and Function Study uses a scoring approach to help determine each settlement’s position in the hierarchy.

Four main factors have been assessed. Each uses a range of datasets, which are grouped into seven scoring bands. These bands are weighted to reflect their relative importance (for example, Band 1 scores highest and Band 7 scores lowest). Some datasets are included for context only and are not weighted.

Key factors used in the assessment

Settlement size
This includes:

  • Population size
  • Number of dwellings
  • Projected population change to 2045

Population size has been classified and weighted to contribute to the overall score.

Employment role
This considers:

  • Levels of economic activity
  • Working-age population
  • Number of local jobs and workers
  • Whether the settlement attracts workers in or sends workers out
  • Employment density (jobs compared to workers)
  • Travel-to-work patterns

The number of local jobs has been classified and weighted as part of the overall score.

Services and facilities
This includes:

  • Role of town centres and the retail hierarchy
  • Availability of strategic and local services (such as health, education and community facilities)
  • Access to ultrafast broadband

The provision of both strategic and local services and facilities has been classified and weighted.

Accessibility and connectivity
This considers how easily people can travel to jobs and services, including:

  • Access to larger towns and major employment sites within 20 minutes (by walking, cycling or public transport)
  • Public transport availability, including frequency and range of routes
  • Rail accessibility, including the number of larger towns reachable within 60 minutes

These elements are combined into an overall score, which is then classified and weighted.

Environmental constraints (context only)
This includes factors such as national and local environmental designations. These are not scored or weighted, but are included to provide important context in the assessment.

How the methodology was developed

The factors used in this assessment were identified through:

  • Review of previous district-level studies and wider best practice
  • Consideration of national policy and the Somerset context
  • Data analysis and evidence base work
  • Internal workshops and early engagement with City, Town and Parish Councils during 2024

How scores are used

Scores from each of the four main factors are combined to give an overall score for each settlement.

Settlements are then grouped into tiers based on score ranges, which reflect typical characteristics and roles of different types of places across Somerset.

Why this approach is used

This method provides a consistent and evidence-based way to compare settlements and to help inform the settlement hierarchy, which in turn supports decisions about how development may be distributed.

Why this matters

The aim is to create a clear hierarchy to help guide where development should go. This helps to:

  • Reduce the need to travel
  • Improve access to jobs, services and facilities
  • Reflect the different roles of urban and rural areas across Somerset

The proposed settlement hierarchy

At this stage, we are proposing a hierarchy with the following tiers:

  • Tier 1: Largest towns (e.g. Taunton, Yeovil, Bridgwater)
  • Tier 2: Main towns across Somerset
  • Tier 3a and 3b: Smaller towns and larger villages
  • Tier 4: Villages with a core range of services
  • Open countryside: Settlements not included within the hierarchy

To be included in the hierarchy, a settlement must typically have at least four key services, including a primary school. These services include things like a GP surgery, food shop, community space and play area.

Important: The hierarchy is not a judgement about the importance of a place. Every settlement plays a vital role for the people who live and work there.

Tier

Settlements

Tier 1

Taunton, Yeovil, Bridgwater

Tier 2

Chard, Cheddar, Crewkerne, Frome, Glastonbury, Highbridge & Burnham, Minehead & Alcombe, Shepton Mallet, Street, Wellington, Wells, Wincanton

Tier 3a

Bruton, Castle Cary, Ilminster, Langport, North Petherton, Somerton

Tier 3b

Abbas & Templecombe
Axbridge
Berrow & Brean
Bishops Lydeard
Cannington
Chilcompton
Cotford St Luke
Creech St Michael
Evercreech
Ilchester
Martock
Milborne Port
Nether Stowey
South Petherton
Watchet
Williton
Wiveliscombe
 
Tier 4 
All settlements have 4 out of 6 key services including a primary school.
Ash
Ashcott
Baltonsborough
Beckington
Blackford
Brent Knoll
North Coker & Easter Coker
Catcott & Edington
Charlton Horethorne
Chewton Mendip
Chilthorne Domer
Coleford
Combe St Nicholas
Combwich
Coxley
Croscombe
Crowcombe
Curry Mallet
Curry Rivel
Ditcheat
Draycott
East Brent
Hambridge
Haselbury Plucknett
Hatch Beauchamp
Henstridge
High Ham
Hillcommon
Hinton St George
Horton (and Broadway)
Huntspill
Ilton
Keinton Mandeville
Kilmersdon
Kingston St Mary
Langford Budville
Leigh-On-Mendip
Long Sutton
Lympsham
Mark
Mells
Merriott
Middlezoy
Milverton
Montacute
North Cadbury
North Curry
North Newton
Norton St Philip
Norton Sub Hamdon
Nunney & Nunney Catch
Oakhill
Puriton
Queen Camel
Rode
Ruishton
Shepton Beauchamp
Shipham
Spaxton
Stogumber
Stogursey
Stoke St Gregory
Stoke St Michael
Stoke Sub Hamdon
Tatworth
Tintinhull
Walton
Washford
Weare and Lower Weare
Wedmore
West Chinnock
West Coker
Westbury Sub Mendip
Westonzoyland
Winsham
Wookey
Woolavington
Open Countryside Others that have 4/6, but not a primary school in the village: Binegar & Gurney Slade, Churchinford, Compton Dundon, Hardington Moor/Mandeville, Kilve, Kingsbury Episcopi, Kingsdon, The Lydfords, Pawlett, Pilton, Seavington St Michael, Sparkford
All remaining settlements

As you answer the questions, please refer to the supporting document and information provided. You may find it helpful to keep these open in separate tabs or windows.

Settlement Role and Function Topic Paper

You can download the Settlement Role and Function Topic Paper to read, or view the document below:

Your browser does not support inline PDF viewing. Please download the PDF.

 

1. To what extent do you agree or disagree that we have used the right information to assess each settlement’s role and function, and its position in the hierarchy?

Information includes factors such as population and size, employment role, services and facilities, and accessibility and connectivity.

2. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposed number of tiers (Tiers 1–4 and Open Countryside) is appropriate?
3. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Tier 3 should be divided into two categories (Tier 3a and Tier 3b) to reflect differences between settlements?
4. To what extent do you agree or disagree with requiring settlements to have a minimum number of key services and facilities to be included in the hierarchy?

The current approach would require settlements to have at least four of the following six services, including a primary school:

  • GP surgery
  • Food shop
  • Primary school
  • Restaurant, café or pub
  • Village hall or community meeting space
  • Children’s play area
5. To what extent do you agree or disagree that we have correctly identified the services and facilities available in each settlement?
6. To what extent do you agree or disagree that we have included all the key services and facilities needed to understand a settlement’s role and function?

This includes whether there are any additional services or facilities that should be considered.

7. To what extent do you agree or disagree that settlements have been placed in the correct tier?

Please consider whether any settlements may be in the wrong tier, based on their size, services, role or connectivity.

8. Berrow and Brean are currently treated as a single settlement in the Study. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this approach?
9. East Stoke is currently grouped with Montacute in the Study. Which option best reflects how East Stoke functions?
10. To what extent do you agree or disagree that settlements with close functional relationships have been grouped appropriately?

This includes settlements that are grouped together because they share services, facilities, or strong connections.

11. To what extent do you agree or disagree that all relevant settlements with close functional relationships have been identified and grouped?

Please consider whether there are any additional settlements that should be grouped together based on shared services, facilities, or strong connections.